Skip to main content
An agent review inspects your Code workspace and reports findings. It is separate from commenting on a GitHub PR.

​
Request a review

Describe what to review and which risks matter:
You can invoke a code-review skill when one is installed. A /code-review command is not guaranteed to exist in every provider’s default installation. Claude, Copilot, and Cursor can record workspace reviews through Mains’s SaveReview, SaveFinding, and SaveFindings tools in Code mode.

​
Codex review

Codex has native review targets for uncommitted changes, a base branch, a commit, and custom instructions. Its findings are mapped into workspace review data. Choose the target that matches your question. Custom instructions describe what to inspect; they are not a promise that every arbitrary Git range has its own selector.

​
Read findings

A structured finding can include severity, file and line range, message, rationale, and a suggested fix. Workspace reviews use Open, In Review, Approved, and Rejected statuses. Codex priorities map to the app’s severity categories. A review status is local metadata. It does not approve or reject a GitHub PR.

​
Act on feedback

Open the referenced code, ask a follow-up, or attach your own line comments. Review the updated diff and verify the relevant behavior before committing. For comments that should appear on GitHub, use Pull request review.